Network Computing is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Foundry Targets Midsize Switch Market: Page 3 of 4

After switching from a Layer 4 to a Layer 7 configuration, I ran the WebAvalanche again. Results showed the expected increase in response time--14 ms at Layer 4 to 5,870 ms at Layer 7--and a decrease in the number of gets per second served--10,000 at Layer 7 versus 13,000 at Layer 4 (see "Performance Results," above).

Although the SI 100's $34,995 starting price puts it in the same field as F5 Networks' competing devices, the series will appeal to the midmarket enterprise in need of an affordable, high-availability Layer 2-7 switching solution. The advantage of not having to configure groups at Layer 4 and the ability to clone servers give this content switch an edge. Still, Foundry may want to address the complexity involved in building rules and group/VLAN identification issues before it goes head-to-head with F5.

Technology editor Lori MacVittie has been a software developer and a network administrator. Write to her at [email protected].

SLB Down and Dirty

Here's the skinny on server load-balancing. A server load-balancer is typically a switch or appliance whose purpose is to distribute client requests to one of several real servers, increasing the capacity of a particular network service, such as Web or FTP servers. A real server is a real machine in the infrastructure processing client requests as directed by the SLB. In many load-balancing scenarios, the virtual IP is the public address of the service--the address used by the client to make requests.

The diagram at right shows a typical SLB network configuration. Other scenarios are possible, but none would change the basic flow of data.