The company reported an actual quarterly net loss of $5.6 million, or $0.24 per share, 9 percent more than last quarter's per-share losses. Gross margins were also down to 25.4 percent of total revenue, compared with 38.4 percent for the second quarter and 36 percent for the same quarter last year.
On the plus side, the company closed the quarter with about $31.2 million in cash, and execs say Vixel is ready to cover its needs for the next 12 to 18 months.
There are other signs management's decisions are steering the ship to better waters. "Reasons for renewed optimism include initial traction of [Vixel's] 2-gig fibre channel switch products and opportunities to serve as a second source with major OEMs, [as well as] two significant OEM customers for its SAN management software and embedded systems customers such as Lucent, Network Appliance, and Vitesse," write analysts Glenn Hanus and Richard Kugele of Needham and Co. in a research note.
Indeed, Vixel, along with QLogic Corp. (Nasdaq: QLGC), has been one of the first out of the gate with 2-Gbit/s Fibre Channel products, preceding archrival Brocade Communications Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: BRCD) by months (see Is Brocade's SilkWorm Losing the Thread?). Management makes no bones about ongoing efforts to serve as a Brocade replacement, competing in the SAN OEM market on availability, features, and price.
Vixel has several contracts under its belt, including as OEM of Fibre Channel ASICs to Network Appliance Inc. (Nasdaq: NTAP) for use in a new generation of filers; and two deals to sell ASICs to Vitesse Semiconductor Corp. (Nasdaq: VTSS).
To realize the benefits of cloud-native software, an application must actually be cloud-native—designed to run in the cloud, interacting with disaggregated cloud services, fully manageable as code—to deliver the expected benefits.
By combining resources and expertise, the AI-Enabled ICT Workforce Consortium will offer a blueprint for how industries can adapt to an AI-dominated future.
IT leaders should heed the guidance of cybersecurity insurance providers who think businesses should prioritize security education, incident preparedness, regular internal audits, and ongoing vulnerability scanning and patching.
