Network Computing is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Sun Eclipses IBM on SPC Test: Page 2 of 3

Ron Johnson, senior partner at the Evaluator Group, says the reason Sun's price/performance for the 3510 looks better is because it's underpricing the competition. "Typically, entry-level external arrays all give more than adequate performance," he says. "The significant thing is Sun has priced it very aggressively."

According to the SPC results, IBM had a slight edge in average response time. The FastT600 had an average response time of 2.3 milliseconds at 10 percent workload level and 28.46ms at 100 percent workload, whereas the StorEdge 3510's average response time was 2.97ms at 10 percent and 29.36ms at 100 percent.

What does IBM say about the tests? Not much. The company sent Byte and Switch this statement: "There are a number of variables that affect these types of benchmarks. As IBM is in the process of analyzing the configuration, pricing, and metrics used, [we] are unable to comment specifically on this test at the present time."

Sun announced the StorEdge 3510 in February 2003, two months before IBM countered with the FastT600 (see Sun Thinks Small on Storage and HP, IBM Muscle Up Midrange).

To ensure authenticity, accuracy, and compliance, the SPC requires completion of a results validation process -- including audit certification and peer review -- before benchmark results become official. IBM's system was tested in August 2003 and the results were accepted in October. Sun's results were submitted for review Monday, and have yet to be accepted.